Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JACON
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 10:55, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
JACON
- JACON (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Extremely limited coverage by
independent sources. Anime News Network is only press releases, Orlando Sentinel is actually an interview with Tara Strong, and about.com does not appear to be an reliable source. Esw01407 (talk) 15:08, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete entirely self-referenced, and there just plain doesn't seem to have been much of anything to say about it anyway. It's also defunct, and while that itself isn't a reason for deletion it does mean it's unlikely that there will be any future notability (or future verifiability). Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:10, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Contested Prod with the removal comment being: "Removed prod - seems like plenty of RS news coverage in Google News Archives; it just isn't in this article", okay great if you found sources then include them, I for one am more than happy to remove Prods, I have seen editors look for sources (myself included) though with nothing turning up. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:40, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete seems to fail WP:NEVENT. The article lacks coverage by reliable sources. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 21:47, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - About.com isn't a reliable source? Anyway, there's a lack of reliable coverage, so this isn't notable. ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.