Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Hodgson (historian)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Jack Hodgson (historian)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jack Hodgson (historian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Failure to meet 'sources' and 'independent of the subject' criteria in the
WP:NOTYOU policy, given that a majority of their contributions consist of working on this article specifically, and most of their other contributions involve the insertion of references to the subject's work on other entries. Demoxica (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, History, Spain, England, and United States of America. Skynxnex (talk) 20:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete -- Still a young academic who may be notable one day. He has completed a PhD and written four articles based on it and a few book reviews. In my view that is not enough for notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:39, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per ]
- Delete I thought perhaps his works were highly cited per WP:PROF, but it appears not. ResonantDistortion 07:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.