Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Pizzey (broadcaster)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Joyous! | Talk 06:22, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Jack Pizzey (broadcaster)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jack Pizzey (broadcaster) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not sure that this broadcaster is notable. I don't see that he meets
Sweat of the Sun, Tears of the Moon (currently a redirect to the article on him), which won a Logie Award, is notable but he is not. Article has been tagged as needing more citations since 2014. This is not the same person as Jack Pizzey, Premier of Queensland. Tacyarg (talk) 19:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, News media, Television, United Kingdom, and Australia. Tacyarg (talk) 19:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete fails ]
- Keep article could possibly do with improvement, but he was a leading broadcaster on Nationwide, an important British TV programme, for several years. PatGallacher (talk) 13:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I think he's notable enough: His profile on the BFI Website lists over a hundred credits; there's plenty of reviews of his work, for example in the New York Times and the LA Times Piecesofuk (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Piecesofuk. Deus et lex (talk) 11:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep As per Piecesofuk. But I agree that the article needs improvement. Fifthapril (talk) 03:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Agree with PatGallacher, Piecesofuk, Fifthapril. I'll look to improve the article. Cabrils (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.