Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Prince (ice hockey)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Prince (ice hockey)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable amateur ice hockey player. Disputed prod by saying it meets #6 of NHOCKEY. However

WP:GNG. Can be recreated when/if he ever meets GNG or NHOCKEY. - DJSasso (talk) 19:59, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: College hockey player without especial distinction. Only the Nottingham Post cite meets the GNG. Ravenswing 17:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 02:03, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Ample list of sources but simply nothing for solider notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Deadman137 (talk) 00:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Reso lute 17:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.