Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Tabb

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. His career does not create a presumption of notability, and adequate sources have not been found to support notability per

WP:GNG. RL0919 (talk) 04:18, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Jack Tabb

Jack Tabb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NGRIDIRON. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:16, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:16, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:16, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable American football player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. He did garner some significant coverage. See, e.g., this two-page profile (pt 1-pt 2). Of course, significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources is needed. I will reserve judgment to see if others can find more coverage. Cbl62 (talk) 02:38, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete According to the NFL site [1] he never played in an NFL game. There's a lack of non-routine coverage to meet the GNG. The article mentioned above is from a local paper about the end of his college career and is not enough to show notability.Sandals1 (talk) 20:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Barring further sources coming to light, there's not enough to pass
    WP:GNG. The article linked in my earlier comment represents significant coverage, but GNG requires such sources in multiple reliable sources. Cbl62 (talk) 22:52, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.