Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagga Jasoos (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jagga Jasoos

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article provides no source that the principal photography has begun. The article itself says "Movie schedules has been delayed due to the prior commitments of the two main leads." Skr15081997 (talk) 07:19, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 06:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both the article and the references are just a collection of press releases or regurgitation of them by newspapers. Nothing here to satisfy
WP:NF. GoldenRing (talk) 09:07, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:08, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as no reliable sources to show principal photography has started, as per
WP:NFF. Moswento ^talky 08:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.