Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James, California

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

James, California

James, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be another point on the railroad, but with a number of wrinkles. First, it appears that the line itself was built in the last 1950s to early 1960s, as no topo map before the late 1960s shows anything here; this is confirmed by an aerial photo from 1951 which also shows no rail line. There is, according to GMaps, a "James W P Road" which meanders about and eventually winds up at a trackside building with the foundations of several other structure around it; I thought it was some sort of manufacturing concern, but Whitepages.com thinks it's a residence. There is definitely a passing siding here, though. Anyway, searching is unsurprisingly hopeless for the most part. It's pretty clear, though, that this isn't a town. Mangoe (talk) 17:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:57, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Mangoe's exhaustive search. The rail line was indeed built midcentury, as the Oroville Dam forced abandonment of the old line. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Seems even more obscure than the usual rail siding or station. I don't see any hope of notability. Glendoremus (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.