Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Campagnola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:32, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

James Campagnola

Non notable musician - 327 ghits (includes many blogs and wiki mirrors), names dropped but proving unverifiable, eg. [1], no solo releases or awards TheClashFan (talk) 03:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 03:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Has not recieved sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources to warrant an article:

Google web search finds his website, facebook profile, and nothing else related.
Google news search brings up nothing at all.

It actually reads like an advertisement to me.--Patton^t/c 13:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note – The nominator has been indef-blocked for sockpuppetry. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 05:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable as above. I browsed through the artist's website but could not find resources there either. Hazir (talk) 06:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.