Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Hannon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:07, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

James Hannon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

i have no idea how this article has lasted so long. I can't find any coverage of Hannon or his self-published works. This looks more like long term vanity spam than anything encyclopedic. Praxidicae (talk) 19:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:27, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:27, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. That photo and its caption made me chuckle! Clearly fails any and all notability guidelines. There is absolutely no coverage. This is just one of the original Wikipedia gems which would be impossible to create today. PK650 (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. I totally missed the caption and only glanced at the poorly photoshopped pic. Gem it is indeed. Praxidicae (talk) 21:51, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. His website does offer some potential reliable sources. One of his books was reviewed on Kirkus and a local newspaper profiled him. Pburka (talk) 00:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails
WP:NAUTHOR and at photoshop. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per
WP:MILL. I looked at the sources on his website. They're all PR. FWIW, I went to JHS 80 for 3 years in Norwood and later taught at MS 308 in the same neighborhood. Bearian (talk) 11:45, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bait30 ^Talk? 17:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.