Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Finch-Saunders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Janet Finch-Saunders

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person is a political candidate only, currently non notable and failing

WP:POLITICIAN if elected of course will warrant an article. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 20:28, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete She would qualify in May if she's elected. Mandsford 21:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per
our guidelines on politicians. In her case, she has been involved as an advisor on Concervative party local government issues, and has been elected to office in Wales, albeit a relatively minor post. I would put her in the same category as Harry Wilson (businessman) and Pete Williams (journalist) as a political figure. Bearian (talk) 18:05, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete I do not think that she meets the notability guidelines for politicians. Her appointment as a political advisor to an assembly member is clearly outside the guidelines, since it is non-elective, unpaid, and what might be called a political aide elsewhere. And although she is an elected councillor on Conwy County Borough Council that authority serves a population of only 112000. AJHingston (talk) 00:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being a candidate means she does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. LibStar (talk) 15:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.