Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Hamlin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Janet Hamlin

Janet Hamlin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She is a technical illustrator who got a complain because she drew someones nose too big. Does this grant her notability? IQinn (talk) 08:06, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - appears to be a case of
  WP:BLP1E, person 'notable' only for one event; no lasting notability. Robofish (talk) 12:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Speedy Delete Zero notability.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 12:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per Robofish.--Epeefleche (talk) 03:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails
  WP:CREATIVE. Qworty (talk) 05:30, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete -
  general notability guideline. Anotherclown (talk) 06:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Speedy Delete - This individual lacks any notability whatsoever.--Yachtsman1 (talk) 18:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.