Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Jacme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If somebody wants to recreate it as a redirect to List of members of the AVN Hall of Fame, feel free. – Joe (talk) 15:39, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Janet Jacme

Janet Jacme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

Note: This debate has been included in the

missfortune 06:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

missfortune 06:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

missfortune 06:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

• keep My search found some coverage to boost the argument that
  WP:GNG is met plus being in the AVN hall of fame meets WP:PORNBIO.Sandals1 (talk) 16:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Please provide sources that show GNG is met and the AVN hall of fame is not an independent reliable source as its function is to promote the porn industry and its actors. Notablity is not inherited. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 07:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep "The sources are not reliable enough for notability"? AVN and XBIZ are the trade journals of the business in which Jacme was employed. She's a member of the AVN Hall of Fame, which (as Sandals1 wrote) means she satisfies WP:PORNBIO. And Lil' Kim cited Jacme in her song "Big Momma Thang" (ranked #13 among the "50 Best Rap Songs by Women"). — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the coverage is no where near enough to meet the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no independent reliable sources cover this subject. Fails
  high quality sources. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 07:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete and redirect to List of members of the AVN Hall of Fame. This BLP simply lacks any non-trivial reliable sourcing; the references are generally press releases, presskit pieces, and kayfabe. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 13:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG, Also dont see any point redirecting. –Davey2010^Talk 13:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect to
  WP:NOPAGE. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:32, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.