Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jang Hye-won

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Jang Hye-won

Jang Hye-won (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed as a part of new article curation process. No indication of wp:notability under with wp:GNG or the SNG. I did not translate the sources but they do not appear to have wp:gng type coverage of her plus, presumably if they did then there could be content on here in the article. There is no content other than to say that she is an actress and model known for her role in a TV show which has no wp article. North8000 (talk) 13:23, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your message. I think you shouldn't delete it because she is a new actress and she still has a long way to go. I added a biography and career. I mean she did participate in Miss Gyeonggi in 2019 and in the very same year she did a lead role in witch store, in future she will be doing more dramas and other activities which people can write here it is too soon to delete it.(59.103.96.130 (talk) 14:52, 14 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for your efforts. I don't think that you understand how Wikipedia works in this respect. Wp:notability covers it. Briefly, the requirement to have a separate article is that there has been substantial coverage of the topic in multiple independent wp:reliable sources. Also, those sources are where the material for the article comes from. But, regarding article quality, adding materia such as you did is helpful because until then there was essentially no content. North8000 (talk) 16:11, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nom. Fails notability. --Jack Frost (talk) 05:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.