Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janice Celeste
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 17:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Janice Celeste
- Janice Celeste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No obvious
WP:BIO criteria for notability. In terms of general coverage, there is one Daily Mail article about her losing a bunch of weight as a grandmother and winning a beauty contest in New Jersey for married women. All other references are passing mentions. Like all of the articles created by this one's author, smells strongly of undisclosed paid-editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 18:25, 25 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 18:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Delete as there are simply no better signs of even a minimally better notable and improvable article here, nothing at all to suggest keeping. Notifying tagger KDS4444. SwisterTwister talk 06:01, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete So far none of the winners of the ]
- Comment - This article's creator, User:Alwayssmileguys, has been indefinitely blocked for paid editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:34, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per above clearly fails WP:ANYBIO .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:08, 27 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Delete, fails WP:BASIC. Sam Sailor Talk! 17:23, 27 December 2015 (UTC)]
- Delete Doesn't meet the notability standard based on what's in the article and what Google digs up. Alansohn (talk) 17:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.