Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarvis Johnson (comedian)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jarvis Johnson (comedian)

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just a promotional BLP. Fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 09:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 09:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 09:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 09:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - A Google News search brings back lots of hits, some of which I've already used to expand the article. YouTube has been around long enough that individual broadcasters can achieve independent notability through coverage in multiple respected sources. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per sources added by Ritchie333. Passes
  WP:SIGCOV. --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep Here's the actual Forbes 30 under 30 profile on him. There's plenty of sources so he looks good and notable. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:56, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Going to sit this one out for a bit and see what people find. Leaning keep. Sources #3 and #4 appear to be GNG passing. [1][2] One more good source should solidify things. That Forbes profile is just 1 paragraph, so probably not SIGCOV. –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:08, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per
  WP:HEY from the work done by Ritchie333. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep as per the above comments on SIGCOV. --
  talk) 15:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.