Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Tromp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Tromp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician; sources do not appear to be reliable or prove how he meets

WP:HOAX. only (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

(talk) 19:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

I tried my best creating a page so I don't see why it should be removed. Should I add a record label, more details, dig deeper? Please let me know because I don't think it's a non-notable musician. Thanks, !testTimo92! — Preceding unsigned comment added by !testTimo92! (talk • contribs) 21:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Take a look at
  WP:MUSICBIO...what criteria there does he meet? And what evidence is there to prove he meets that criteria? only (talk) 21:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Delete as none of this including the Dutch Wiki has any better satisfying signs of a better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 21:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eh? Take a step back from your computer, count to 10 and then re-read what you typed

- HyperGaruda (talk) 20:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 21:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. Fails
WP:MUSICBIO criteria: no significant coverage in reliable sources, mentioned awards are from a non-notable social network for musicians, most biographical information is from a musician's version of LinkedIn, has never reached national music charts... - HyperGaruda (talk) 20:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete As HyperGaruda said: Fails WP:GNG and WP:Musicbio. -- Hybris1984 (talk) 21:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient reliable sources. Fails GNG. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.