Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Ganger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 23:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Ganger

Jeremy Ganger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub article with no evidence of notability.

• Delete fails
  WP:GNG. — Czello 16:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
  Talk to my owner:Online 16:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - While the sources in the article are crap, the same stories were also run by WWE, USA Today, the New York Post, Miami Herald, Dayton.com, Dayton Daily News, Fox, Pro Wrestling Torch, Figure Four Wrestling. To say "no evidence of notability" shows a complete lack of WP:BEFORE. It's tough to find information on his wrestling career, as it's buried in the "hero wrestler" news articles. There's enough content in those, however, to piece together a brief biography and expand the hero/honorary NXT champion section. The article will never be GA-class, but it just passes the threshold for GNG and could be a decently sourced stub or start-class article (note: "stub article" isn't grounds for deletion). GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Most of the sources relate to his involvement in the shooting, which suggests
  McPhail (talk) 23:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• What I have written, I have written. We see this differently. You already said your piece. I don't need you to badger me. GaryColemanFan (talk) 07:43, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• It's hardly badgering. Questioning responses in AfDs is standard to make sure the argument holds up. If the
  WP:SINGLEEVENT point can't be addressed then it kinda undermines your keep vote. — Czello 10:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• What I have written, I have written. We see this differently. You already said your piece. I don't need you to badger me. GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:28, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No notable as a pro wrestler. About the shooting incident, it falls into
  WP:SINGLEEVENT . --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:52, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete Really nothing notable, except for the fact that he was shot-
  WP:SINGLEEVENT. Also, GaryColemanFan, you aren't being badgered. Your points are being questioned. Vdbhi (talk) 23:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Please don't tag me. As for your comment, I understand what you are trying to do, but you are unaware of the long-term context, so your comment misses the mark a bit. Thank you for your vote. GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.