Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessie Williams
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to WP:BOLD but that's a personal editorial decision and not covered by the result of this discussion. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:43, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Jessie Williams
- Jessie Williams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Actress has played a single role in a TV show, she fails
WP:ENT. Prod was removed. Several actors from the same show have had articles deleted for the same reason. AnemoneProjectors 17:49, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- NotAnonymous0 did I err?|Contribs 18:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- NotAnonymous0 did I err?|Contribs 18:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - some actor bios have been kept in the past if they are recurring supporting actors in a single TV series; Williams has been on a dozen eposodes. Bearian (talk) 20:18, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Tracy Beaker Returns. There's not really much to say about her right now except that she appears in Tracy Beaker Returns. If she appears in a different children's programme as well, then I'd say there'd be enough for an article. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:34, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Tracy Beaker Returns without prejudice toward recreation if or when her career expands and she receives coverage in reliable sources. While her 12 episodes are fine, they are she is credited with doing. The article is premature. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:21, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:44, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply
- Redirect to Tracy Beaker Returns as has been suggested above. There is currently not enough material available or independent notability established to support a separate article. Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 20:16, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as above; also her friend Amy-Leigh Hickman (who needs a separate AFD). If she proves to have a more substantial career, the article can be reverted to a substantive article. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:16, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.