Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jethalal Gada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Jethalal Gada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not follow

• Strong Keep - The subject is the central character[1] in the longest running sitcom (over 10 years) of the indian television history and many mainstream sources have pages dedicated to him [1] , [2], [3] , [4], [5]... Also "Jethalal" has received widespread popularity over the years, has definitely become a household name and is regularly appearing on every show of this very popular sitcom since past 10 years^[2]. --Adamstraw99 (talk) 09:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Please look at the aticle. Subject is treated as a real person in the article and there is lack of sources in the article because there are not many references discussing about the character in real world sense. We already cover this information in main sitcom aricle as well as in characters article. Why we need a separate article on a single character if we already have an article on characters of the sitcom? Please see
  MOS:TVCAST. Most references you listed above are in-universe information or provide little information about Jethalal character. Regards,-Nizil (talk
  )

"Why we need a separate article on a single character"? -- Because he is the central character appearing in each and every episode of the longest 10 years running most popular sitcom series of india .. --Adamstraw99 (talk) 14:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He is a central character of a long-running show but look at the article which has only "in-universe" information. There are not much references on the "real world" information about the character. I am asking the reason for a separate article because we have already separate List article for characters. -Nizil (talk) 05:44, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I agree with Nizil. -Gazal world (talk) 14:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - FYI, there are separate pages for Myrcella Baratheon, Rickon Stark, Viserys Targaryen, etc of A Song of Ice and Fire. Deal with them first, if you don't always aim to reject ""Indian"" related pages.

• WP:WAX does not help. Every article is judged on its own merit. It is not about Indian or other nationality issues.-Nizil (talk) 04:46, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• keep-
  talk) 00:15, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  Hamim000000, we already have separate list article on characters. Why we need separate article on single character? Do we have enough real world informaion on him to have a separate article?-Nizil (talk) 05:44, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

  ]

Well many mainstream media already covered Jethalal Gada. That's why I think the article should not be deleted. And one think I want to add that we created a separate article on tnkoc cast although we covered the cast in

talk) 13:39, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

I think there is not enough well referenced real-world information to have separated article for Jethalal Gada and what is covered is "in-universe". All in-universe information on him is also covered in characters article. So in my opinion, there is no need for separate article even if he is daily appearing TV character.-Nizil (talk) 04:37, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from hundreds of popular videos, Jethalal and his popularity is very much covered in numerous sources [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11].. and i can post many more coverage but info in my trail comments and this must convince you unless there is some competitive agenda IMHO, Thanks --Adamstraw99 (talk) 09:30, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adamstraw99, Jethalal is a popular character but there is already an article on characters which covers information on him. The references you posted above has no detailed information on his characters apart from telling that it is popular and successful. This thing is already covered in the character article and thus no separate article is needed IMO. If we have references on role, development, Characterization, themes, critical reception of Jethalal; I would agree to have separate article from the characters article but I could not find any details. So the subject is better served by the character article alone. -Nizil (talk) 12:35, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and redirect to
  existence of other stuff, I fail to note any merit in the claims of keep !voters.∯WBG^converse 13:59, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge and Redirect to
  WP:TNT. I did not expect we would have characters from shows, but I can see we do at least have some (e.g. Shaggy_Rogers). It's not clear to me there is enough secondary independent coverage to justify its own article. --David Tornheim (talk) 10:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.