Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jhalra halt railway station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Jhalra halt railway station (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable train stop. Nothing famous happened here, it's just a point on a map. Not meeting GNG. No historic buildings at the site, no historic events took place here, I can't find much of anything for sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 18:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 18:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  May be I have made some mistake in writing, but it does not mean that you will remove the writing, fix it and improve it, it is also available on Google Maps, I will give you the link. Theanjum (talk) 04:34, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  May be I have made some mistake in writing, but it does not mean that you will remove the writing, fix it and improve it, it is also available on Google Maps, I will give you the link. Theanjum (talk) 04:10, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The article states that the station opened in 1840, which contradicts the nominator's claim about "no historic buildings". The article is a harmless stub. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The 1840 date might be a mistake, but the photos don't suggest that the station building was built recently. And if it was built in the pre-Internet era, offline sources may need to be consulted. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:16, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May be I have made some mistake in writing, but it does not mean that you will remove the writing, fix it and improve it, it is also available on Google Maps, I will give you the link. Theanjum (talk) 04:15, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the first passenger train in India reportedly ran in 1853, I'm going to call the 1840 opening date BS. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:38, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May be I have made some mistake in writing, but it does not mean that you will remove the writing, fix it and improve it, it is also available on Google Maps, I will give you the link. Theanjum (talk) 04:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May be I have made some mistake in writing, but it does not mean that you will remove the writing, fix it and improve it, it is also available on Google Maps, I will give you the link. Theanjum (talk) 04:15, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Delhi–Moradabad line or to Madhusudanpur Nand Urf Jhalra (but the latter article was created by the same author and has its own problems). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Delhi–Moradabad line. There is apparently nothing substantive about this station except that it is a station. In that case we normally redirect to the line in question. Mangoe (talk) 01:05, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  May be I have made some mistake in writing, but it does not mean that you will remove the writing, fix it and improve it, it is also available on Google Maps, I will give you the link. Theanjum (talk) 04:15, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Delhi–Moradabad line. There's no significant coverage to meet GNG, and the historic building claim is questionable since we don't know if the original structure exists or is/was historically significant. One minor quibble: Delhi–Moradabad line says the route is electrified as of 2016; do the photos in the article and linked sites predate this? –dlthewave ☎ 12:38, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Delhi–Moradabad line, No evidence of notability to warrant a seperate article, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect, to Delhi–Moradabad line, It is not notable on its own. Alex-h (talk) 13:34, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to
  WP:GNG. The person who loves reading (talk) 16:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.