Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jigsaw Squirting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:38, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jigsaw Squirting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product, cannot find evidence of meeting

WP:GNG. Kinu ^t/_c 18:24, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete Nonnotable product. Edison (talk) 18:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
maintain In the document's potential growth potential. --174.121.226.33 (talk) 10:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: User is blocked. OSborn^arf_contribs. 23:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Probably shouldn't even be up for AfD but just CSDed under A7 for lack of indication of importance. It's barely in English, cites no sources and is totally non-notable: it's a dildo attached to a ~~power drill~~ jigsaw. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. ——Tom Morris (talk) 11:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per
talk) 12:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

maintain A great article about women's erogenous zones to. --46.243.9.247 (talk) 22:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: User is blocked. OSborn^arf_contribs. 23:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fairly unclear article about a product for which it fails to establish any notability. OSborn^arf_contribs. 23:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.