Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Feldkamp (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Feldkamp

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. While this was kept in the original deletion discussion back in 2008, Wikipedia's standards for the

New York Times citation that completely fails to mention Feldkamp at all, and which is being cited only to support a tangential fact about one of his campaign donors. Neither the sourcing here, nor the substance of what it's supporting, is enough to make him more notable than the norm for an unelected candidate. Bearcat (talk) 14:43, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 01:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' Back in 2008 when this article was kept it was somewhat thought that candidates for US House of Representatives were notable if nominees for major parties. Today we have recognized that such is not the case. There is not enough coverage of him to justify keeping an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:31, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.