Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Mowrer

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to

04:26, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Jim Mowrer

)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mowrer's only claim to notability is being a candidate for the

WP:POLITICIAN notes that merely being an unelected candidate isn't enough and I don't see anything else here. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:15, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:15, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 03:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:25, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.