Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Mowrer
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to ♔ 04:26, 23 November 2014 (UTC)]
Jim Mowrer
Mowrer's only claim to notability is being a candidate for the
WP:POLITICIAN notes that merely being an unelected candidate isn't enough and I don't see anything else here. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:15, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:15, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 03:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to WP:SOLDIER, a redirect to the target stated in my first sentence is the best solution.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)]
- Redirect to United States House of Representatives elections in Iowa, 2014#District 4 per RightCowLeftCoast. This is an appropriate outcome for an unsuccessful candidate running for a national office Enos733 (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2014 (UTC).]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:25, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.