Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmie Lee (comedian)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--

"talk" 11:36, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Jimmie Lee (comedian)

Jimmie Lee (comedian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NMUSIC. Sources are almost all local entertainment rags, which are more local entertainment calendar than news. Works do not appear charts, and landing a role in a pilot does not establish notability. Being mildly - or even moderately - successful does not make one notable enough for an encyclopedia entry. ScrpIronIV 22:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC) ScrpIronIV 22:10, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Also, has various different careers that are mentioned in various press articles, Notable person with three careers, impressive- SRB

  • Keep - Sources are real press coverage,with alot of bio and information on subject.

He has articles in detail about himself, as well as upcoming venues. Subject has multiple music albums(CD Baby) and has performed many comedy shows (YouTube) . Very talented and multifaceted person. - LLW — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.57.111.243 (talk) 00:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as there's some coverage here of course but simply nothing actually confidently convincing. Delete for now at best, SwisterTwister talk 23:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.