Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Don Duncan

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Drmies (talk) 03:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Don Duncan

Joe Don Duncan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails

WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 07:15, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 08:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a
    WP:GNG pass, per Cbl62's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 05:59, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:05, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Notable Division II college football Little All-America selection. Although I believe this is a much closer call than Cbl62 does -- we should not even be discussing coverage by SBNation/"Mile High Report" and the university's student media for purposes of establishing notability -- I count at least four articles in independent, reliable media that constitute significant coverage of the subject's college career and All-America honors linked by Cbl above. I am less than impressed with the bloggy one-paragraph mentions in the hometown newspaper of the university, and, as I mentioned in another pending AfD, I am concerned and conflicted by articles about former CFB players whose "technical" satisfaction of GNG is based entirely on sports column coverage of their failed attempts to make a regular season NFL roster. This latter issue is problematic and has led to a growing cluster of perma-stubs about which we can only say that that the subject played for CFB Team X, and he was signed as a free agent and cut by NFL Team Y without ever having played a down in a pro game. I'm not sure what the encyclopedic content, if any, is in such articles, and we really need to find a better way of analyzing of such cases. Fortunately, that problem is not at issue in the case of Joe Don Duncan. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:04, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.