Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Gnoffo

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 22:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Gnoffo

Joe Gnoffo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability requirements under

WP:GNG; insufficient sources found in article or WP:BEFORE. Pop culture magazine/web sources even about a reality TV show, his wife, or their child are pretty thin; just not enough substance about this individual's life. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:56, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I am the creator of the page. At first, I thought I was creating an article with enough room for development, but I realized as I was developing the page that there wasn't much to develop :-/ --Qwacker (talk) 07:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep or Draftify: I don't think this page is necessarily a lost cause. There are a few credits that could go towards
    WP:NACTOR and a lot of hits at "google news", which will need to be sifted through. I note that the creator of the article thinks that deletion is appropriate, but maybe moving it to "draftspace" might allow others to uncover new sources. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 05:28, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.