Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Turman (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Joe Turman
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joe Turman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No consensus in 2009, but no evidence he's a notable veteran, missionary or author. StarM 19:45, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. StarM 19:45, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. StarM 19:45, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. StarM 19:45, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete one fairly niche press review of his work seems to be the only independent source on him, that is not enough to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:SPA and functions as free advertising for his books. It should be swiftly uprooted to eliminate corruption of the purpose of Wikipedia. Newshunter12 (talk) 23:36, 18 December 2020 (UTC)]
- Delete. There was no consensus 11 years ago, but I think the arguments by DGG and others were stronger. One major source has not been considered "significant coverage". Bearian (talk) 21:48, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Back in 2009 I argued on the basis that his books were in almost no libraries. This is 11 years later, so I checked again. Hist three books are atill in almsot no libraries: 13, 4, and 2 Worldcat libraries. Tho not all evangelical college libraries are included in worldcat, all the well-known ones are, and not one school of any sort has a copy of any of the books except ]
- Delete - clearly there has been time for his works to have made more of an impact, and they haven't, so delete as per failure to meet ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.