Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Baker (entrepreneur)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to D2L. Merge if there is anything of value and redirect accordingly. Missvain (talk) 04:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John Baker (entrepreneur)

John Baker (entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject might not have substantial enough independent coverage. It includes self/company published with the rest being award specific, WP:OR or his school. Needs cleanup if article is kept. Swil999 (talk) 19:57, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Swil999 (talk) 19:57, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Swil999 (talk) 19:57, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to D2L if that company is truly notable. I object to the notion that he is even borderline notable as a philanthropist unless independent reliable sources devote significant coverage to him as a philanthropist. Charity board directories are far from enough, since they are not independent. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect - to D2L, since he is mentioned there. There is nothing worth merging into the company article. Onel5969 TT me 01:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.