Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Hartwell (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John Hartwell

John Hartwell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Athletic directors are not automatically notable (see

WP:ATH) - lacks significant coverage about the individual in any independent secondary sources. All sources provided in previous AfD were simply related to his appointment as athletic director not about any notable achievements. Dan arndt (talk) 00:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Keep Cleary notable subject. In addition to the sources provided in the last AFD, see [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] for significant coverage that establishes notability of subject. Jweiss11 (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Appears to pass GNG per sources listed above and at the prior afd. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Appears to pass GNG per sources listed above and at the prior afd. Cbl62 (talk) 01:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per sources presented by Jweiss, subject passes GNG. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Meets
    WP:BASIC, just like he did at the last AfD. Nothing has changed since then. Ejgreen77 (talk) 12:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.