Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Hein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to ScotsGay. MBisanz ^talk 05:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Hein

Declined A7 speedy. Appears to fail WP:BIO. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:26, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- fr33k man -s- 05:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- fr33k man -s- 05:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into ScotsGay? I can't find any third-party sources written about this guy, but he does seem often-quoted with the implication that he is somehow influential or authoritative, in association with that publication: here are some sources to back that up: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. If anyone can find any sources specifically written about this guy, I would say to keep the article. Cazort (talk) 00:35, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into
WP:BIO though. Agree with Cazort above. Parslad (talk) 00:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.