Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Appleseed (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 01:52, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Appleseed (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason:There is already a spot for this cartoon, and that's for Melody Time. There shouldn't be another article for something already there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickey798 (talk • contribs) 17:36, 24 September 2011 (UTC) Mickey798 (talk) 17:25, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 17:32, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 17:33, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: There isn't already an article for it - it is just a section in the Melody Time article. There is no harm for having a section for the film and an article for the film. The film is indeed notable by itself. SL93 (talk) 21:55, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
keep—tis true that the article is unsourced, but the film is independently notable, given the range of significant discussion in reliable sources. there is this, and also this, and kind of this, and this too. the last notes that this film contains disney's only significant imagery of heaven. i will throw these into the article as further reading and for future incorporation as sources. — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 01:03, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep While less notable films "might" have a home at
WP:NF. We keep it, expand it, and source it so as to improve the encyclopdia and the reader's understanding of this topic. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:29, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Released on its own, with notable coverage of it existing. Dream Focus 23:48, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.