Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathone Sangma

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:20, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathone Sangma

Jonathone Sangma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think he fails

10:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 11:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 11:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Election candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates — if they weren't already notable enough for a Wikipedia article for some other reason before becoming a candidate, then they have to win the election, not just run in it, to become notable enough for a Wikipedia article — and dying on the campaign trail does not boost his notability over and above any other candidate. Any candidate could always show as many sources as are shown here, so the amount of coverage his death got is not evidence that he's a special case. Bearcat (talk) 01:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as not holding a public office. All coverage relate to the assassination and death of the person, which is quite common for any incident of sabotage. MT TrainTalk 04:42, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.