Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Dangerfield

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:11, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Dangerfield

Jordan Dangerfield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article makes no assertion of notability. Jordan Dangerfield was an undrafted free agent who was released before playing a single snap of professional football. That's not enough to satisfy

WP:NGRIDIRON and there is no non-trivial coverage. There are dozens of such prospective NFL players every year and they aren't notable for being on the preseason team. Further, as an article about a player not in the news (because he's not playing) it's not being updated. At the time I encountered the article on October 23 it still claimed he played for Buffalo, even though he'd been released nearly two months ago. After fixing the references I proposed the article for deletion; the article's author removed the PROD tag on October 29 with a minor edit (no edit summary). That's his right but it's unhelpful. In sum, it's a non-notable stub with no prospect of expansion. Mackensen (talk) 12:36, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep article does assert notability. I'm finding widespread coverage for his college playing career and should be enough to pass
    WP:GNG. References should be added to the article.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:43, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.