Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Fernández Menéndez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Fernández Menéndez

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet

WP:NOTABILITY, and has been tagged as such for over 11 years. Although it has a Spanish and Arabic article, they are just direct copies of this, with no real sourcing or evidence of notability. Boleyn (talk) 15:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:01, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ The only source is a book with a mention of one of his books in the footnotes. A further search didn't find much else besides social media,
WP:CLONE sites. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:21, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 18:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep One important detail from the Spanish article is that he received a National Journalism Award for best editorial in 2000.[1] He's also referenced on the award's main page[2]. If I'm incorrect on this award establishing notability, please let me know.Skeletor3000 (talk) 23:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've added the award to the article. I tried to expand it further to better establish notability, but independent sources are scarce (or at least I'm bad at finding Spanish-language sources). If the article passes this AfD, I'd assume the notability template could be removed on the basis of the national award. Skeletor3000 (talk) 22:48, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Changing my vote to ‘’’Weak Keep’’’ per Skeletor3000’s improvements. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:26, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.