Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josefina Gatlabayan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Angelito Gatlabayan. ✗plicit 00:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Josefina Gatlabayan
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Philippines. JTtheOG (talk) 19:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
This article shall not be deleted, as it was supported by news articles that will sustain the legitimacy of the subject person. ]In addition, I hereby request for all Wikipedia articles about government and politics IN THE PHILIPPINES, including elections, to be verified and checked ONLY by the Filipino Wikipedia authors, as we know more of the topics to be discussed. Some of our news in early 2000 to early 2010 were not posted online. ]- AtorniYormeJKLlamera, that's not how this works. Drmies (talk) 19:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Therefore, I hereby request for thorough reading and checking of this article before considering the deletion of it. Shall delete, it must have valid reason for deletion. Consider checking the articles and election results that will prove that the subject is legitimate and she is a duly elected public official. ]- The issue is not whether she is an elected public official. The sources in the article confirm this. However, since the subject is a local politician, she is not inherently notable for winning her election, and must instead meet WP:GNG. Filipino Wikipedia editors are more than welcome to find and present any sources that cover Gatlabayan directly and in detail in order to satisfy this guideline. JTtheOG (talk) 20:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)]
I agree with you, but it is wrongful to say that she is not qualified mainly because she is a local politician. In province of Rizal, she is notable because her spouse (mentioned in article), who has separate Wikipedia article is a former mayor and congressional representative Therefore I hereby request Filipino Wikipedia editors to carefully review and check this article and state the valid reason/s why this article should be deleted. ]- I did not say "she is not qualified mainly because she is a local politician". I said that this does not make her inherently notable, and she must instead meet WP:GNG. Her spouse being notable does not make her notable, either. Please provide sources that cover Gatlabayan directly and in detail if you wish to keep this article. JTtheOG (talk) 18:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)]
- I did not say "she is not qualified mainly because she is a local politician". I said that this does not make her inherently notable, and she must instead meet
- The issue is not whether she is an elected public official. The sources in the article confirm this. However, since the subject is a local politician, she is not inherently notable for winning her election, and must instead meet
- AtorniYormeJKLlamera, that's not how this works. Drmies (talk) 19:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to ]
- Support per nom ~Politicdude (About me, talk, contribs) 02:08, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Angelito Gatlabayan and tag as "R from spouse". The article's notability isn't proven yet. Note that AtorniYormeJKLlamera was indef blocked as a sockpuppet. --Lenticel (talk) 02:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect per previous votes. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to WP:INHERIT. Barely found anything about her aside from the incident where she was a target of unidentified men during a campaign back in 2004. ASTIG😎🙃 13:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.