Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph O'Rourke (activist)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Joseph O'Rourke (activist)
AfDs for this article:
- Joseph O'Rourke (activist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A possible non-notable person. I tried finding sources for him, but the ones I found were already in the article with a [reliable sources?] tag around them. If those sources are in fact reliable, I could possibly see him as notable, but I'd like to take it here to get a second opinion. Tavix (talk) 00:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Those sources appear to be biased against him. Hence the lead sentence. The article itself has a CSD G10 feel to it. - Mgm|(talk) 00:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Keep I'm not seeing any BLP violation. But if the wording is off or there are other sources please fix the article. Seems to be notable based on substantial media coverage. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:51, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per above. --]
- Keep With the further reading section added, there is ample sources to fix the issues I've seen. - Mgm|(talk) 13:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 00:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I suppose this passes WP:Verifiability with the sources, and WP:Inclusion as well. I had some vague issue of this being not neutral when I read the article though, though I can't figure out why. Could someone who is more neutral than me on these issues please take a look at it? - NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 04:15, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.