Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Jones (businessman)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker (talk) 06:01, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Jones (businessman)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this person passes the GNG. The one citation from Forbes is nothing but a brief mention that could support an article on Sarrell Dental, but says nothing really about our subject. Other coverage is local (Crimson White is the campus newspaper), and Google didn't deliver anything useful. Drmies (talk) 19:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I didn't find much useful information after some research to validate this person qualifies for an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XjiGsawyouthx (talk • contribs) 19:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 20:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 20:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've performed some cleanup and reformattting to improve this article but agree that there is not sufficient in-depth coverage for subject to cross the notability threshold. Two of the three listed bibliography items are essentially self-published. - Dravecky (talk) 18:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps some of this could be merged to Emercy (which is itself woefully under-referenced and out of date) then convert this to a redirect. - Dravecky (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.