Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy MiniPig
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Joy MiniPig
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Joy MiniPig (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not neutrally written, full of fluff ("intense research"??), lacking proper secondary sources that have more than local interest. Not an noteworthy subject. Drmies (talk) 16:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:11, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable pig; I would have allowed a sentence in an article about the theater itself, if it was on the NRHP for example. Oaktree b (talk) 20:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as not notable. talk page) 14:29, 7 June 2022 (UTC)]
- Delete. For the lack of notability. --Evilfreethinker (talk) 16:15, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.