Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Adams

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Guerillero Parlez Moi 21:27, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Adams

Juan Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NMMA notability criteria. His highest quarterly ranking by FightMatrix was one hundred thirty fourth, far short of the top 10 requirement. Also never appeared in Sherdog's rankings. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 16:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Passes WP:GNG. Are we really gonna start deleting every fighter who hasn't appeared in the top 10? That's gonna be like 99% of the pages. Removing the participation criteria basically neuters any combat sport notability since combat sports have way less major titles, there isn't a draft, there isn't constant tournanments that it seems all the other sports criteria rely on. Isn't a huge amount of the sports pages on wikipedia coming from basketball, football, and soccer where guys in literally 2nd national leagues would get pages? HeinzMaster (talk) 00:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not happy about it either to be honest, but I'm trying to target pages that are relatively unnotable. Like Adams for example is 1-3 in the UFC, probably best known for losing to Greg Hardy, and has never been highly ranked. If you could provide some sources with significant or indepth coverage about him to pass GNG, I'd be happy to withdraw the nomination. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 07:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG plus the background section and infobox data are extensive. I've been scared about the recent progression of these deletion policies and if it goes to this, I will be completely retiring from Wikipedia editing. It's just senseless. Ticelon (talk) 09:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.