Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Azar LeBlanc
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Judy Azar LeBlanc
- Judy Azar LeBlanc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparently non-notable author, article tagged with {{notability}} since december 2007. (Can't find the books mentioned when searching the Library of Congress website, but not sure if everything is available online.[1]) Bjelleklang - talk 18:40, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. I cleaned up the bibliography a bit. There is a hit at LOC for her, but only for Theology 101. Most (but not all) of her work is vanity or self-published. There is evidence of some significant third-party review. Faustus37 (talk) 00:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All of her books are self-published (talk) 17:53, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:32, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Huntley 02:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Faustus37. ]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser TSU 03:36, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per ]
- Delete failing ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.