Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Sinelnikova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Sinelnikova

Julia Sinelnikova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PR, notability suspect, CV-like, product of paid editing: see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jacobmcpherson_paid_editing Acousmana (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Acousmana (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I am not convinced by the sources. The article itself is hugely puffed up, and tries to make run of the mill items like a Banff Centre residency (tens of thousands of artists have done that) into a giant achievement.--- Possibly (talk) 06:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There are not enough sources to qualify for
  WP:GNG. All I can see is PR spam. Grailcombs (talk) 16:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete a non-notable artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, concurring with other editors. This article was draftified in September 2020 and then moved back into article space, apparently by a paid editor, in violation of
  conflict of interest rules. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Weak keep - there's some coverage, and whether it's significant is arguable. She has had art displayed in NYC. Bearian (talk) 16:38, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if it's relevant here, but I actually didn't receive any money for the creation of this article, which is accurately depicted on my user page Jacobmcpherson (talk) 19:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.