Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumbleme (digital encryption service)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 23:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jumbleme (digital encryption service)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Email encryption company. Fails

WP:ORG. Not sure how it made it through AFC, but was PRODed and refunded. Website now redirects to one that sells Twitter followers. Fuebaey (talk) 03:25, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

(talk) 03:33, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete for now and I would've notified the AfC accepting user and the PRODder but they seem to have since retired, my searches found links at Books, News, browser and Highbeam though not much so there's likely not much for an article yet. SwisterTwister talk 17:15, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 09:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —

^Talk 15:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete - other than a few brief mentions at News, Books and Highbeam, absolutely no in-depth coverage. Add to that the promotional tone of the article and it's a clear delete. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.