Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungkook

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — ξxplicit 04:44, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jungkook

AfDs for this article:
Jungkook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

BTS.(Toomass (talk) 10:11, 13 August 2016 (UTC))[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 17:11, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 17:11, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as was the case with Minzy's page before, just because a member is popular does not mean they need a separate page. Peachywink (talk) 00:57, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Although I do see that those petitioning for Delete do have valid points, I'd like to point something out. While BTS (admittedly, Jungkook is their most popular member) have a very large international following, they do even more so in Korea. I think a lot of people are forgetting that, just because he has made "appearances on show programmes" which don't seem very "notable" for international fans, I lived briefly in Korea a few years ago for a student exchange, and popularity works very very differently over there. K-Pop idols in themselves are the equivalent of our A-List celebrities. So, very popular or well-known people such as G-Dragon are Korea's equivalent popularity-wise to say maybe Sam Smith or Miley Cyrus (although I'm not comparing the artists themselves, mind, simply the popularity scale). So while these appearances may seem insignificant, they carry a lot more meaning in Korea. I'm not saying that those asking for delete are wrong necessarily, as they are valid points, I'm just merely stating that things are very different in Korea and this should be taken into account when it comes to the pages of celebrities from non-English speaking countries. - Cora Quinn — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.165.36 (talk) 07:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no evidence of notability,Due to wekipedia's standard page for living people he does not have any solo work to need separate page in wikipedia,,,, to BTS's fans and non-wikipedia users:wikipedia is not a fanpage that you create article just for kpop fans for enjoy,he is not popular if he was, he must have many solo work just like EXO and BOGBANG members even BTS member V,i can not find any notable work in his career,delete and protect.(1chinchin (talk) 11:39, 23 August 2016 (UTC))[reply]
WP:AFD/Today
.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξxplicit 06:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete No solo work, nothing notable. Information is nothing that of a fan page rather than an informative wikipedia article. Keep argument is nothing more than a fan trying to argue for it to remain but references idols such as G-Dragon who do have a strong solo presence. He may be an idol but he has no notable solo work and therefore does not require a solo page. Popularity ≠ requiring an individual page. Delete and protect. 217.42.59.250 (talk) 23:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete how many times this page was deleted and created again? he is not notable yet without any notable solo work,delete and protect (Pikhmikh (talk) 02:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]
  • Keep He has established notability outside his band. He has had appearances on notable shows without his band (King of Masked Singer and host for MBC Music Core) as well as a strong fanbase. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 19jshi (talkcontribs) 02:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.