Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Duerr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete/redirect, default to keep. No firm consensus to delete or redirect this article has been established, and it would appear through the below the discussion that several sources have been provided which would warrant this article's preservation. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 21:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Duerr

Justin Duerr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet

• Redirect - Seems some people were a bit enthusiastic about the film, but Duerr is not currently notable. All substantial coverage about him is mainly in connection to the film. -
  talk) 15:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: I have added five additional references that I believe pass
  WP:RS and constitute significant independent coverage of Duerr, specifically regarding his art and music. (Roomsmoody1924 (talk) 19:18, 27 October 2013 (UTC))[reply
  ]
• Redirect to the film. I don't know. I feel this could go either way, but I'm leaning toward a redirect. Any coverage that could be considered significant seems tied to the film. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Going to err on the side of caution here because multiple sources are provided. When leaning in a any one direction it is best to keep rather than redirect to the an article that is less likely to integrate it in a merge. We have coverage outside the film and that is enough to adequately cover a small article. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:07, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Yes, just adding the thought that if the article is merged, the content specifically related to his music, zines, or art would likely need to be cut, as it's unrelated the film, (though the film does mention his art briefly) but there are multiple third-party references here that justify/support this small article on Duerr being kept intact for this aforementioned content. (Roomsmoody1924 (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2013 (UTC))[reply]
• Keep per ChrisGualtieri and Roomsmoody1924. Fitnr 21:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Added another citation just to bolster the article a bit more. I think there are plenty of good citations available to possibly expand the article a little, and certainly enough to support it as is. I'd be up for doing more work on this article if it is kept. (Roomsmoody1924 (talk) 04:58, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.