Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Københavns Badminton Klub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Københavns Badminton Klub

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization, lack of GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 21:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep:It is a 90-year old club with multiple national championships and many notable members. I really don't see why anyone would consider it unnotable unless it relies on a bias based on sport and/or country. I have no idea what "GNG" stands for since I don't normally take part in this sort of discussions and is therefore unable to address that issue.Ramblersen (talk) 17:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. seemsto havea substantial history . We're pretty inclusive for sports organisations like this. DGG ( talk ) 01:31, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. notable badminton organization. Lack of GNG doesn't mean this articles is non-notable. Stvbastian (talk) 05:14, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.