Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kafeneion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kafeneion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Purely local coverage focussed primarily on recent opening. The likelihood a popup that has been open for six weeks being notable is slim. Valereee (talk) 12:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Australia. Valereee (talk) 12:27, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nythar (💬-🍀) 12:34, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the nominator. This restaurant opened in May, a little over a month ago. The coverage is extremely minimal. Generally speaking, most restaurants are featured in at least one or two minor articles in online newspapers or magazines, and others are subject to reviews, yet none of this is enough to pass
  WP:NCORP. Nythar (💬-🍀) 12:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Comment After careful consideration, I support its deletion for the following reasons: limited notability due to primarily local coverage, a short operational history that raises doubts about long-term impact, and i believe promotional language that goes against Wikipedia's guidelines. I kindly request that the page be reviewed for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. Thank you for considering my viewpoint. Ahoj Ashu (talk) 12:46, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, coverage is local and routine for restaurants and there is no evidence whatsoever that there will be sustained regional interest. Fails NCORP. JoelleJay (talk) 22:28, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete only open 6 weeks and deserves an article? Coverage is local in Melbourne's newspaper the Age. Restaurants need long-standing coverage in wider sources. LibStar (talk) 04:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails
  WP:CORPDEPTH --Devokewater 16:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.