Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kara H. Eastman
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Kara H. Eastman
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non-notable politician who fails
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 13:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:52, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:52, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:53, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete losing candidate covered only in the context of her elections. SportingFlyer T·C 10:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed, only famous for losing. Oaktree b (talk) 15:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they did not win — the notability test at Kara Eastman already exists as a redirect to the election, pursuant to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kara Eastman (2nd nomination) — but just altering the title does not mean that the earlier discussion isn't still binding on whether she qualifies for an article or not. Bearcat (talk) 14:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.