Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karel Martens

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per

WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 16:16, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Karel Martens

Karel Martens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:BIO, non-notable individual and unreliable sources used JMHamo (talk) 01:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 04:44, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 04:44, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The article has been in poor shape and needs work: I have made various changes but left the final paragraph for the duration of the AfD despite it being discussion more appropriate on the Talk page (and which does the article no favours - I originally expected to conclude with a Delete opinion). However, the subject of the article has in his career received two awards which have WP articles (now linked and verified) and I notice is also described as an "éminence grise" in his field on the
    Stedelijk Museum site [1], so I think there is enough for biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 11:55, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Keep per User:AllyD. I think the two prizes are enough for notability. filceolaire (talk) 16:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:50, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.