Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kari Berg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:57, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kari Berg

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has been created by the subject 'Kari Berg' herself user:MissDeVine as a means of self promotion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diastinaut (talk • contribs) 12:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the majority of the sources in the article are not independent of the subject. Does not pass
WP:NBIO. SailingInABathTub (talk) 15:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - At this point there are not enough notability for this singer. No good sourcing or charting songs etc.BabbaQ (talk) 16:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I have not been able to find sufficient sources to support notability per
WP:AUTHOR. Beccaynr (talk) 18:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete No sources found, one article in Swedish, others are unrelated with only a hit on the Berg name. Oaktree b (talk) 19:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the above reasons, plus because she made a page about herself and didn't even bother to follow proper styling. A quote in italics without quotations? Christ, dude! AdoTang (talk) 22:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for all the above reasons, and principally for violating Wikipedia's policy against self promotion. The article has only gone this long without deletion due to virtually no one searching or viewing it, except by accident. Diastinaut (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.