Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karpagam College of Engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Karpagam College of Engineering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability: there seems to be very little information about this institution online apart from two official looking websites, neither of which are functional to a level beyond confirming the name, location and contact details. There may instead be grounds to have a general page for Karpagam Educational Institutes which apparently incorporates a number of educational institutes, although references for such are equally unavailable.
Misuse: This page looks like an advertisement of available courses, in lieu of a functional website. Looking at the history of the article, it seems many attempts have been made to discourage this kind of use, but the college (presumably) persists in their misuse. Additionally, it was found to have a personal message to students in the body of the article which affirms suspicions that this is being used as a personal website and noticeboard.
Cantivsto (talk) 01:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Large parts of this article were text taken from other education institutions' websites, about their own courses, and have been removed. Normally a post-school education institution defaults to notable, but this looks more dubious as a result of that edit history, though I suppose if
evidence of its accreditation is found, it will survive. (Though probably in need of some protection against being spiced with misleading wannabe text from other institutions.) AllyD (talk) 07:28, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 03:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I believe this article should be deleted. The college itself isn't even notable.

Robert (talk) 05:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

SarahStierch (talk) 01:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone 03:13, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – Recollected • 07:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete small private colleges are not inherently notable. and this one sorely lacks third party coverage. fails WP:ORG LibStar (talk) 00:56, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.